Full title of the article: The Moody Church: “The Flower And The Fruit” of DL Moody’s Great Work As Represented In The City Of Chicago”

An address delivered by Rev. James M. Gray, D.D., President of the Moody Bible Institute, in The Moody Church Tabernacle, on the occasion of laying the cornerstone of the D.L. Moody Memorial Church and Sunday School Building, December 16, 1924. He praises D.L. Moody and discusses (in 1924) “apostasy known as Liberalism or Modernism” and the 4 pillars of the Gospel.

https://www.moodymedia.org/articles/the-moody-church-the-flower-and-the-fruit-of-dl-mo/?utm_source=Moody+Church+Media+-+Email&utm_campaign=bdab69e554-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_985f5af69b-bdab69e554-50546013

I just learned today about the New English Translation (NET) Bible. It’s not brand new, coming out in 2001. I’m quite impressed. Here are some reasons I will use the NET Bible and their websites. (I’m not jumping to it whole hog, but plan to use it as a useful resource in understanding God’s Word).

• It has over 60,000 translators’ notes. I’m trying to understand the original Hebrew and Greek (and Aramaic), so this may help. There are 3 types of notes:
  • tn: Translator’s notes – explains the rationale for the translation and gives alternative translations, interpretive options, and other technical information. I believe this is one reason they wanted to create this type of Bible (and what makes it unique from other translations.)
  • tc: Textual critical notes, which relate to significant textual variants. Discusses alternate (variant) readings found in the various manuscripts and groups of manuscripts of the Hebrew Old Testament and Greek New Testament.
  • sn: Study notes, as in other study Bibles. Includes comments about historical or cultural background, explanation of obscure phrases or brief discussions of context, discussions of the theological point made by the biblical author, cross references and references to Old Testament quotations or allusions in the New Testament, or other miscellaneous information helpful to the modern reader.
• NET Bible is online and free. Can have an account, have highlights and notes.
• The online (computer) version had a very nice side-by-side display. See graphic below.
• Included on the RHS (as an option) is Constable’s Notes. This Bible commentary is from pastor, theologian, and DTS faculty member Thomas L. Constable.
• The parallel view can put the Greek (or Hebrew) on the RHS (right-hand-side). This is very cool. Words on both the left and right are clickable. Very dynamic. The Strong’s number appears at the bottom. Nice! See second graphic below.
• I believe this mainly comes out of Dallas Theological Seminary (I’m sure with the help of other scholars) and I believe that DTS is a solid, biblically-based seminary.

The following article describes archaeological finds to prove facts from the Bible that skeptics have tried to claim were false.

https://www.beliefnet.com/faiths/christianity/6-incredible-finds-that-proved-the-bible-was-true.aspx?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=cslewis

I asked ChatGPT: List guidelines for having a healthy, respectful, and informative discussion.

The response was 12 guidelines:

Here are some guidelines for having a healthy, respectful, and informative discussion:

1. Listen Actively

• Pay attention to what others are saying without interrupting.
• Show that you are engaged by nodding, asking follow-up questions, or summarizing what was said.

2. Respect Different Opinions

• Acknowledge that others may have different perspectives or beliefs.
• Avoid dismissing, mocking, or belittling someone else’s point of view.

3. Speak Clearly and Concisely

• Express your thoughts and opinions in a clear, organized manner.
• Avoid long-winded explanations; stay on topic to keep the discussion focused.

4. Use “I” Statements

• Speak from your own experience by using “I think,” “I feel,” or “In my experience.”
• This helps avoid sounding accusatory and keeps the discussion personal and constructive.

5. Stay Calm and Composed

• Keep your tone of voice neutral and avoid raising your voice.
• If you feel yourself getting upset, take a deep breath or pause to collect your thoughts before responding.

6. Avoid Personal Attacks

• Focus on the issue at hand, not the person you’re speaking with.
• Refrain from name-calling, sarcasm, or making derogatory remarks.

7. Be Open to New Ideas

• Be willing to consider viewpoints that differ from your own.
• Ask questions if you don’t understand something, rather than immediately rejecting it.

8. Seek to Understand, Not Just to Respond

• Make an effort to understand the other person’s perspective fully before crafting your response.
• Clarify points if needed by asking, “Can you explain more about…?”

9. Use Evidence and Examples

• Support your arguments with facts, data, or real-life examples when possible.
• This helps make the discussion more informative and grounded in reality.

10. Agree to Disagree

• Recognize that it’s okay to have different opinions and that you may not reach consensus on every topic.
• Respectfully agree to disagree if no common ground can be found.

11. Respect Time and Space

• Be mindful of the time and avoid monopolizing the conversation.
• Allow others to share their thoughts without dominating the discussion.

12. Follow Up if Necessary

• If the discussion was intense or unresolved, consider following up later to continue the conversation in a more reflective manner.
• This shows that you value the relationship and the ongoing dialogue.

These guidelines help create a positive environment where everyone feels heard and respected, leading to a more productive and informative discussion.

Here was my question to ChatGPT (genesis of this below):

There are various groups and movements that are trying to tear down Christianity or otherwise deconstruct it. Among other things, they argue against the truth claims of Christianity. Three such groups are secularism, atheism, and moralistic, therapeutic deism. Are there other groups or movements that I haven’t listed?

ChatGPT responded with nine more.

Yes, there are several other groups and movements that challenge or seek to deconstruct Christianity, in addition to secularism, atheism, and moralistic therapeutic deism. Some of these include:

1. Religious Pluralism: This movement asserts that all religions are equally valid paths to truth, effectively undermining the exclusive truth claims of Christianity.
2. New Age Spirituality: A broad and eclectic movement that often incorporates elements of Eastern religions, mysticism, and occult practices, promoting a relativistic view of truth that contrasts with Christian teachings.
3. Postmodernism: A philosophical movement that questions objective truth, including the idea of absolute moral and spiritual truths as taught in Christianity. It often promotes relativism and skepticism toward meta-narratives like Christianity.
4. Cultural Marxism: This ideology critiques and seeks to dismantle traditional power structures, including those based on Christian values. It often views Christianity as a tool of oppression.
5. Humanism: While similar to secularism, humanism specifically emphasizes human reason and ethics without reference to the divine, often viewing religion, including Christianity, as unnecessary or even harmful.
6. Progressive Christianity: While not necessarily seeking to tear down Christianity, this movement reinterprets traditional Christian doctrines in ways that often challenge orthodox beliefs, sometimes aligning more with secular or liberal ideologies.
7. Scientism: This is the belief that science alone can provide truth about the world, often dismissing religious or metaphysical claims as unscientific and therefore invalid.
8. Agnosticism: Though not necessarily hostile to Christianity, agnosticism promotes the view that the existence of God or the divine is unknown or unknowable, which can lead to a dismissal of Christian truth claims.
9. Skepticism: A broader philosophical stance that questions or doubts religious and metaphysical claims, often leading to the rejection of Christian doctrines.

These movements and ideologies, in various ways, challenge the foundations of Christian belief and seek to reinterpret or deconstruct the faith from different angles.

I was listening to a wonderful lecture by Albert Mohler titled, “Being a Christian in a Post-Christian Culture: 2010 Washington, D.C. Conference.”

Address my first three fairly extensively. (Included was the four horsemen of modern thought. Marx, Darwin, Nietzsche, Freud.)

Link: https://www.ligonier.org/learn/conferences/being-a-christian-in-a-post-christian-culture/disappearance-god?utm_source=RefNet&utm_medium=Show&utm_campaign=ConferenceSeries

[from Christianity Today)

There’s a hidden Christian message behind what may be the most celebrated image of the 2024 Olympics.

On July 29, in round three of the shortboard surfing competition, Brazil’s Gabriel Medina faced off against Japan’s Kanoa Igarashi, who eliminated Medina in the last Olympics. In his second wave, Medina emerged from a tube exuberant, with both palms open, suggesting that the judges should offer him a 10 for his performance. (Two of the five judges agreed; his final score was 9.9).

Medina then pivoted left, toward the surf, and jumped off his board, raising his right hand and pointing his index finger upward. This was the image that Agence France-Presse photographer Jérôme Brouillet captured.

Brazilian evangelicals recognized the sign immediately.

“It’s like he’s saying, ‘It’s not me you should be looking at, it’s God. This moment of glory is not mine, but His,’” said João Guilherme Züge, a resident historian of religion at Museu Paranaense, in Curitiba.

This has been used by Brazilian athletes for about 40 years, gaining popularity in the 1990’s.

I like the humility and praise of God.

Randy Gradishar (LB) was a key centerpiece of the Orange Crush Denver Broncos defense (he played 1974–1983). At his NFL Hall of Fame induction speech in Canton, Ohio, he, very clearly and succinctly, gave the 4 truths of the Gospel and thanked teammate Archie Griffin for inviting him to attend a FCA (Fellowship of Christian Athletes) meeting. It was Gradishar’s senior year and Griffins sophomore year on the Ohio State Buckeye football team. As a result, Gradishar, at age 22, received Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

We can be thankful for people like Archie Griffin and Randy Gradishar who are bold to share the truth of Jesus Christ. We need to do likewise.

2:13 minute Video

Click this image to view the snippet from Gradishar’s speech on Twitter/X.

Full Induction Speech Video

Heisman Footnote

As a footnote, in Gradishar’s senior year at OSU (1973), he placed 6th in the Heismann Trophy voting, one behind Archie Griffin. Griffin would go on to be the only 2-time Heisman Trophy winner in ’74 and ’75.